Input | Output |
---|---|
Link | Youtube |
Published | 2024/03/04 |
Theme | |
Status | article incomplete |
Beau says:
Audio reveals Russia's fear of losing a critical bridge, prompting questions on their intelligence capabilities and influencing American political decisions.
Political analysts, policymakers, concerned citizens
Importance of staying vigilant and informed about international relations and potential foreign influence.
#Russia #Germany #Ukraine #NATO #Intelligence #PoliticalDecisions
Well, howdy there, internet people, it's Beau again.
So today, we are going to talk about Germany and Russia
and some audio and what that audio can tell us
about Russian priorities, their concerns,
and a little lesson that the average American
should take away from it as well.
OK, so if you missed it because of everything else going on,
some audio surfaced, and it's German higher-ups
talking about whether or not to provide Ukraine
with a specific missile system.
And this missile system is one that could, theoretically,
be used to hit a bridge that is critical to Russia
being able to provide supplies to Crimea, okay?
The thing is, this audio, it came through Russian channels.
The Russians released it.
The conversation was basically the Germans going back and forth about should we give
this to them, how many should we give to them, they could use it for the bridge, maybe give
them 10 or 20, but we don't need to give them 100 because it's not really going to help
with the ground offensive.
It's this kind of stuff.
So what can we tell about Russia itself by the release of this and by them rattling their
saber over it a little bit?
They are scared of losing that bridge.
It is a huge priority for them to dissuade anybody from helping Ukraine get that bridge.
Why do we know this?
Because this audio undercuts a key narrative at home, a key narrative that Russia has been
pushing at home and that's that it's fighting all of NATO and all of NATO's equipment and
their best equipment and all of that stuff.
It's very clear.
No, you're fighting NATO's attic.
Key weapon systems are being held back.
This audio undercuts that narrative.
So there's that.
They're very concerned about losing that bridge.
That's a big takeaway from it.
The other thing, the thing that the average American should remember is that while Russia's
military intelligence has proven to be less than intelligent lately and the sections tasked
with maintaining the areas they want to keep in their sphere of influence, you know, the
former Soviet republics, they're not great, their foreign service still is, and they can
get access to compromising audio or video when it comes to pretty sensitive discussions.
What do you think that means about their ability to get compromising audio or video?
about personal discussions when it comes to political figures. That's something
they're really good at historically and it certainly appears that they still
possess that capability. At some point the United States is going to have to
ask why certain politicians appear to be constantly making decisions that benefit
Russia. At some point that question is going to have to be asked. This is a
clear demonstration that they still have that capability, that they're still good
at it.
That might be the key takeaway for the United States, for the average American.
For NATO, the key takeaway is they really don't want to lose that bridge.
Anyway, it's just a thought.
Y'all have a good day.
{{Shirt}}
{{EasterEgg}}