Input | Output |
---|---|
Link | Youtube |
Published | 2023/06/13 |
Theme | |
Status | article incomplete |
Beau says:
Exploring the differing reactions of House Republicans and Senators to news about Trump, revealing electoral concerns and self-preservation over moral principles.
Political analysts, voters
The full transcript provides a detailed analysis of the political motivations behind Republicans' support for Trump, which may offer deeper insights into US politics.
#RepublicanParty #Trump #Senate #House #Elections
Well, howdy there, internet people, it's Beau again.
So today we are going to talk about the House and the Senate
and why Republicans in the House and the Senate
are acting differently when it comes to the news about Trump.
We're going to do this because we had a pretty insightful
question from a European.
The question was basically, why is it
only the Republicans in the House that
They're just going all in on Trump, defending him, saying that he did nothing wrong.
There's not a lot of senators doing it.
Is this because McConnell knows something that Republicans in the House don't know?
Or is it that generally senators are, let's just say, less inflammatory?
those are possible. So, generally speaking, senators are more deliberate, okay? Not
always the case, but generally speaking. And nobody is ever going to accuse me
of underestimating Mitch McConnell. He is the type of person who knows where
everybody's secrets are buried, which means he gets a lot of information. Even
setting that aside, I'm going to suggest there's a whole bunch of things that
Mitch McConnell knows that Republicans in the House don't. It is completely
possible that he got information and he used that to tell the other senators to
just kind of bite their tongue on this one. Both of these are possible. I think
there's a much simpler answer, though. Generally speaking, when you look at the
Republicans in the House who are going all in on Trump and they're defending
him in every way shape and form. They're pretty much all in incredibly
gerrymandered red districts. They don't have to worry about running. They don't
have to worry about the negative voter turnout that accompanies Trump and to
some extent those who support Trump. In the Senate, it's not always the same story.
They have different electoral concerns. Senators represent the entire state. So,
if they come out heavily in favor of Trump, well, we have all those little blue
sections on the map and those people might turn out in bigger numbers and
cost them their seat. I don't think it's a sign of them having higher ethical
standards or being more moral, I think it's them putting themselves above Trump, which I mean it's
only fair, that's what Trump did to them. So I think that's what it is. I wouldn't read too much
into it regarding their loyalty to the U.S. or their loyalty to the rule of law or anything like
that. I think it's probably just an electoral concern. If they come out and
they're all in on Trump, they will upset people in their district or in their
state who could vote them out of office. Whereas if you're in a red district and
you're pretty safe, you can say whatever you want in support of Trump. You don't
have to worry about those numbers increasing in the blue areas because
there aren't enough of them to matter. For the Senate, yeah, there's definitely a
risk of cities turning out in higher numbers to get rid of you. I think that's
probably what it is. That or, yeah, McConnell probably knows something. He's
been around a real long time, he is very plugged in and it would not surprise me
if he knew a whole lot more about this case than the general public does. Anyway,
It's just a thought. Y'all have a good day.
{{Shirt}}
{{EasterEgg}}